Steve Hilton, the controversial British strategist, is making waves in American politics with his unexpected bid for California's governorship. Known for his zany policy ideas and unorthodox working style, Hilton's journey from the UK's Conservative Party to the US's Democratic stronghold is a fascinating one. This article delves into the reasons why some are skeptical of his chances, while others see potential in his disruptive approach.
A Disruptive Strategist
Hilton's reputation as a disruptor precedes him. In the UK, he gained prominence for his role in modernizing the Conservative Party and his director of strategy role under David Cameron. His working style, however, was often described as eccentric and frustrating. Hilton's penchant for pushing boundaries and challenging the status quo is a double-edged sword. While it has earned him a reputation as a maverick, it has also led to criticism from those who value stability and compromise.
The 'Big Society' and Beyond
One of Hilton's most notable contributions in the UK was his 'big society' idea, which aimed to empower local communities. However, this initiative was met with mixed results and disappointment for some. Vince Cable, a former Liberal Democrat leader and member of Cameron's coalition government, views Hilton as an ideologue rather than a practical politician. Cable's skepticism highlights the challenge of translating grand policy ideas into tangible political success.
A Trump-like Discontent
Hilton's admiration for Donald Trump is well-documented. He has been described as someone who "knows how to wind people up like Trump," and his rhetoric has drawn comparisons to the former president. This has raised eyebrows, especially given Hilton's past association with more liberal Tory policies. The question remains whether his Trump-like approach will resonate with Californians, a state known for its progressive values and strong Democratic leanings.
The Challenge of Compromise
A former government adviser who worked with Hilton paints a picture of a person quick to become frustrated with the realities of governance. His impatience for compromise and instant results could be a significant hurdle in a state like California, where political dynamics are complex and nuanced. The US state's dysfunction, as compared to the UK, might present even greater challenges for Hilton's disruptive style.
A Different Kind of Disruption?
Despite the skepticism, some argue that Hilton's approach could be exactly what California needs. In an era of rapid change and technological disruption, a leader who challenges the status quo and embraces agility might be beneficial. Giles Kenningham, a former press head at No 10, suggests that Hilton's ability to push through changes and his unconventional thinking could be assets in a volatile political landscape.
The California Connection
Hilton's move to California in 2012 and his ambition to become governor indicate a personal connection to the state. His friends and colleagues believe that his understanding of the American political landscape, combined with his unique approach, could be a game-changer. The fact that he predicted Trump's victory in 2016 and his modernization of the Tory Party, despite initial criticism, suggests that Hilton might be ahead of the political curve.
Conclusion: A Long Shot or a Game-Changer?
As Hilton navigates the California primary race, his friends and colleagues remain divided on his chances. While some see him as a long shot, others believe that his disruptive style and connection to the state could be a powerful combination. The question remains whether Hilton's approach will resonate with Californians and whether his British quirks will translate into a successful political career in the US.
